Anthropology exams don’t have to be dreadful. I know that different
things work for different people, depending on the way their minds work to
process and store information. I’ll describe what worked for me when I was a
university student. You decide if this method of studying works for you.
For any general anthropology exam (cultural, social, and even
physical), we must know four main things that work somewhat like strongholds
for everything else.
1. Key anthropology figures
2. Key anthropology theories (approaches, “schools of anthropology”)
3. Key anthropology concepts
4. Specific examples to illustrate numbers 2 and 3
Our professors want us to remember the key figures who have influenced
the field of anthropology, but who cares about names and dates if we don’t know
what they practiced and believed in? For each anthropologist, we must know the
following:
- what does this person believe?
- how does he/she think the society works?
- his/her main focus (ethnography, linguistics, medicinal plants,
evolution, gender, etc.?)
- which words and concepts does he/she like to use?
- most famous writings by this anthropologist
- other anthropologists whose approaches he opposes or supports
Also, as a nice extra, it’s always good to know one or two memorable
quotes that you could gracefully use in your exam.
Being a visual person, I used both written notes and various charts. For
example, as a basic memorization technique,
I would draw a big circle named “functionalism”, and write the names of
all functionalist anthropologists inside. I did the same for evolutionists,
structural anthropology, relativism, etc. I would also make bubbles and connect
them to “school” circles. Inside the bubbles I wrote basic concepts and ideas
for each approach and school of thought. Of course, this was just a bare
skeleton, some very general information to remember.
Even if two anthropologists belong to the same school of thought, their
ideas might differ greatly. So, they might be in the same circle – evolutionism
– but their thoughts about what evolutionism is and how it works might be
different. They can use different terms to describe their theory and come up
with various categories. Also, anthropologists’ thoughts and ideas can change
throughout their lives, so any given school of thought is not something rigid
that an anthropologist must necessarily adhere to for ages.
In my studies I also wrote a particular name, let’s say “Anthropologist X” on a piece of paper, and
underneath I wrote all the key words related to that person. It could be a long
list of various terms, names, countries, titles, for example, “structuralism,
systems of exchange, reciprocity, New Guinea, opponent of evolutionism,
opponent of anthropologists Y and Z, animism, believed behavior.” You can write
this on flash cards for each anthropologist and carry them around, quizzing
yourself throughout the day. A name will stick with a set of particular terms
and titles, even quotes. If you do this in addition to reading all the assigned
literature and actually understanding it, you WILL remember.
In my experience, knowing anthropologists and their theories well is essential to passing any written exam in general, cultural, social anthropology.
You can have brilliant ideas and examples from real life. You can remember a certain book or story well and use it to illustrate something in relation to the exam question. You can understand a concept and describe it without naming any anthropologist or school of thought. Most of the anthropology is actually real life, something we all deal with every day. It happens to us, around us, in the world we perceive from different angles.
However, in our classes and during exams, professors do want to see that we remember what we have learned. They want us to understand existing theories and use the names of those who worked in the field before us. We must use their concepts and give them credit, and apply established concepts in our discussions.